Hot New Job Opportunity— Regulator
Looking for a new career path? Regulation is the place to be. National regulators, regional regulators, international regulators, your era has arrived. Germany chancellor Angela Merkel and British Prime Minister Gordon Brown were calling for global economic regulators, even a UN Economic Council, to keep tabs on the financial system. “What we're looking for is a far more effective early warning system,” said Brown.
Like it or not, said buyout king Henry Kravis, the regulators are coming to the world of private equity and hedge funds. And you are thinking: not a moment too soon. The hedge fund industry, among others, has spent the last couple of years ferociously fending off any proposal for subjecting it to regulation, under the notion that having those bureaucrats eyeballing their risk exposure somehow stifles innovation. And that self-interest is the best regulator of all. Those ideas got destroyed in the last couple of months, along with not a few hedge funds. Now the tune has changed. There will be no more resistance. “Regulation is coming and it's coming in a big way,” said Donald Gogel, ceo of the U.S. private equity firm Clayton, Dubilier & Rice.
Given that regulators are getting their share of the blame for the meltdown—where was the SEC in stopping CDOs from getting out of hand? Why didn't Treasury stop the banks from overleveraging?—it's sort of curious that there's such a clamor for the bureaucrats now. But the sentiment is that it's better to have some regulators, any regulators, rather than have large areas of finance running amok. “One thing's that been revealed from the disasters in financial service is there are all sorts of gaps in regulatory architecture and all sorts of opportunities for arbitrage,” noted Peter Sands, chairman of HSBC. It's those gaps that have created all the mischief, he said. “We've had a vicious interaction with regulated banks and shadow banks. If it walks like a bank and quacks like a bank it ought to be regulated like a bank.”
It's not just the finance industry that's clamoring for more regulators. Ken Powell, the ceo of General Mills, a food company that has the happy status of being recession resistant, joined the chorus of regulation boosters. It's not that he wants more regulations, just more regulators. Think of that— A captain of industry demanding more interference from the government. “Clearly we need more regulatory capacity. FDA funding has declined,” said Powell. “Our industry is arguing that that has to be reversed.”
So here's one area where there could be some job growth. No one was offering an opinion as to where they are going to find all these new regulators. Certainly there is an ample pool of finance industry talent made redundant by the crisis who might now be available to do the job. They obviously know where the weaknesses are, since they exploited them until the whole thing exploded. By the same token, when you hear the first complaints about this new crop of regulators—maybe at this same meeting next year— you will have a good indication that the crisis is easing.
-
1
Bill – Your post is spot on. It's no surprise that there will be increased regulation. But, additional regulation won't fix problems in the finance industry that exist in the organizations themselves. We're in this troublesome situation because of failures in internal controls, risk management and professional judgment.
It's not enough to hire anyone in finance to serve as “compliance cop.” These professionals need to be properly educated so as to not fall into the old traps. That's why professional organizations, like the Institute of Management Accountants and others, take the lead in offering certification, research, and professional education to prepare practitioners for these types of challenges. The finance industry is doomed to fail if professionals aren't prepared for the challenges that lie ahead.
Jeff Thomson, President and CEO, Institute of Management Accountants
Most Popular »
- Best of the Decade: Sci-Fi Movies
- Is Harry Reid Burning Out?
- How Will Obama Pay For Stimulus 2.1? (or 3.0, 3.1, whatever you want to call it)
- The Health Reform Abortion Wars, Part Deux
- "How Will Dave Ever Make Fun of Sex Scandals Again?"
- War of the Supermen: Q&A With Matt Idelson
- Why Wells Fargo isn't paying back TARP
- Quinnipiac: Obama Gets Bump on Afghanistan
- Economists Growing More Wary of the Senate Health Bill
- How to Outsmart a Debt Collector
- The Truth Behind the Leaked Climate-Change E-Mails
- Mexico Witness Protection: Corrupt Program, New Killings
- Tiger Woods Must Face His Fans' Moral Outrage
- Helicopter Parents: The Backlash Against Overparenting
- Taiwan: World's Lowest Birthrate Could Affect Society
- Creating Jobs: Can Obama Government Boost Employment?
- How Strong Is the Evidence Against Amanda Knox?
- Time to Give Up the Ghost on bin Laden
- Humanure: Goodbye, Toilets. Hello, Extreme Composting
- Study: Parents' Sex Talks with Kids Happening Too Late











RSS